Training Tip of the Week:
Discriminatory No-Pet Policies

Posted on

Grace Hill Training Tip of the Week

No-Pet Policies Can Be Discriminatory

According to The Case for Fair Housing: 2017 Fair Housing Trends Report by the National Fair Housing Alliance, of all reported complaints of housing discrimination in 2016, nearly 55% involved discrimination against people with disabilities. That’s a staggering statistic.

 

To ensure full compliance with the Fair Housing Amendments Act, housing providers must make reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of people with disabilities in securing and using housing. An accommodation is a change in any rule, policy, procedure, or service if the changes are needed for a person with a disability to have equal opportunity to occupy and enjoy full use of their housing.

 

One of the most common accommodation requests people with disabilities make is to have an animal that would otherwise be restricted by a community’s rules.

Unless a no-pet policy specifies an exception for assistance animals, it may be considered discriminatory to residents with disabilities who might require an animal for assistance.

Consider this case: The owner of several apartment complexes and rental homes in San Jose sent a letter to residents stating that he did “not like to deal with pets of any kind” and that residents could not “introduce any new pet or replacement pet.”

 

In a civil complaint, The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) accused the property owner of discriminating against residents with disabilities. The property owner settled with DFEH for $100,000. As part of the settlement, the owner will undergo in-person training annually for three years and must develop a new reasonable accommodation policy. Interestingly, the owner must also provide semi-annual reports to DFEH about the number of requests for accommodation and the nature and outcome of those requests. Read more about the case here.

 

Make sure that your no-pet policy makes a specific exception for assistance animals.

What can you do to avoid finding yourself in a similar situation?

 

  • Ensure that any prohibition against pets, whether verbal or in writing, makes a specific exception for assistance animals as reasonable accommodations for residents with disabilities.
  • Remember that assistance animals are not pets. Rather, they provide an important service to people with disabilities, and you must handle these accommodation requests in compliance with the law.
October 11 2018

Grace Hill Announces Acquisition of The Strategic Solution

The connection will improve company performance and risk reduction efforts for clients

Read More

Schedule a Demo

Get Started